Cycling Safety And The b=n+1 Rule

Cycling Safety IDs

Clive’s blog today really struck a chord.  I have diabetes.  I ride alone at least once a week, after dark.  I have diabetes so if I was to take a tumble or get clipped by a motorist, I could potentially be having a post-exercise hypo whilst insensible with an injury.

I’ve looked at RoadID before and always thought they looked cool, but expensive and that I was unlikely to wear them each time I ventured out.  I’m not inclined to keep a wrist band on permanently, as I do a corporate job and a watch is enough adornment.  I remove the watch and my two rings when I ride as I don’t like things jangling about on me.

So, Clive’s blog was a Godsend.  These little stickers stick onto your lid, so if you’re a cyclist you’ll never leave home without them accidentally.  Now that’s perfect for me, as I don’t run. At all.

Ask yourself: if you were to come a cropper on a ride, what would happen next?  Then, think about buying the stickers, eh?

The b=n+1 Rule

Chris reminded me of something I’d forgotten this morning.  The equation b=n+1 applies to all cyclists, where:

  • b = Number of bikes required
  • n = Number of bikes owned

This equation defines us all as cyclists.  Once it takes effect, there’s no going back.

This equation is the reason that I downloaded the eBay app to my iPhone.  This equation is the reason that I saved the searches “Rz120” and “Whyte t120s” into the eBay app.  Now whenever anyone puts either of those two bikes for sale on eBay, I will hear a cheerful “BING!“, see a notification on my phone and instantly become stressed about whether or not to get involved in watching, or worse still participating, in the sale.

Oh yes, of course I rationalise: I’ve told myself that I’m just seeing how cheaply you can pick up a nice 120mm trail bike.  I’ve told myself that I’ll save up diligently and not spend impulsively.  I’ve told myself that I’m looking at shiny new trail bikes because my son is outgrowing his 24” bike and I can pass on my Fat Boy to him, so I actually really neeeeed a shiny new trail bike…

But we all know, it’s just the maths working their magic.  The equation’s got me.  I’m doomed.  I’m a cyclist.

Are you? 😉

Share this page:

4 comments on “Cycling Safety And The b=n+1 Rule

  1. One Loose Nut

    The Helmet Sport ID is a good idea, but one I keep putting off until tomorrow. Now I have a new helmet it’s probably time to do something about it.

    As for the formula: I am currently going through the b=n+1 stage, but have only managed to make the purchase successful by agreeing the alternative b={(n+1-1) OR (w=x-1)}, where w=wife and x=current number of wives. Ho-hum.

  2. Pingback: And so it begins… | Cure Sam

  3. PhilR

    Meant to comment on this when I read it the first time but forgot, oops. 🙂

    If you have the iPhone then there’s also the ICE (In Case of Emergency) app where you can list all sorts of stuff from blood type, your Doctor, current problems and much more. As more and more of us use apps on the iPhone to track our rides I think this is a good one to have as a backup to the Helmet ID. Just keep the app on the front screen for it to be seen. 🙂

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Where is your business growing to?

Find out how Phill Connell Marketing Solutions can accelerate your business growth. Practical, realistic steps to improve your revenue generation.

%d bloggers like this: